Pathogen prevalence and human mate preferences. Sexual dimorphism in the prenatal digit ratio (2D:4D). Galis, F., Ten Broek, C., Van Dongen, S., & Wijnaendts, L. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 31, 413–419. Defining the brain systems of lust, romantic attraction, and attachment. E., Aron, A., Mashek, D., Li, H., & Brown, L. Lust, attraction, and attachment in mammalian reproduction. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 1253–1262.įisher, H. Second to fourth digit ratio and sensation seeking. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349–354.įink, B., Neave, N., Laughton, K., & Manning, J. A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Are the correlates of sociosexuality different for men and women? Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 1321–1327.Ĭohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25, 113–124.Ĭlark, A. Self-perceived attractiveness and masculinization predict women’s sociosexuality. The association between digit ratios and sociosexuality: A failure to replicate. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 23, 779–818.Ĭharles, N. Neuroendocrine perspectives on social attachment and love. Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1–49.īuss, D. Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Estimating number of lifetime sexual partners: Men and women do it differently. Masculinized finger length patterns in human males and females with congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Ellison (Ed.), Reproductive ecology and human evolution (pp. Reproductive physiology of the human male: An evolutionary and life history perspective. Organizational hypothesis: Instances of the fingerpost. Fingers as a marker of prenatal androgen exposure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 339–363.īerenbaum, S. Sexual economics: Sex as female resource for social exchange in heterosexual interactions. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 347–374.īaumeister, R. Gender differences in erotic plasticity: The female sex drive as socially flexible and responsive. Neuroreport: For Rapid Communication of Neuroscience Research, 11, 3829–3834.īaumeister, R. Is autism an extreme form of the male brain? Advances in Infancy Research, 11, 193–217.īartels, A., & Zeki, S. Biological Psychology, 68, 215–222.īaron-Cohen, S., & Hammer, J. Finger length ratio (2D:4D) correlates with physical aggression in men but not in women. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 30, 319–345.īailey, A. Testosterone and human aggression: An evaluation of the challenge hypothesis. This sex difference was discussed in terms of flexible female sexual strategies, which are supposed to be contingent on the local environment or menstrual cycle variations.Īrcher, J. Female participants ( n = 142) did not show this relationship in Study 2. Study 2 found a negative relationship between Short-Term Relationship Orientation and left, but not right, hand 2D:4D among 65 male participants, even after controlling for age, relationship status, social desirability, and sex drive. Study 1 found a negative relationship between Short-Term Relationship Orientation and right, but not left, hand 2D:4D among 91 male participants. In the current studies, we hypothesized that Short-Term Relationship Orientation would be negatively related to 2D:4D finger-length ratio (i.e., the more masculine, the higher Short-Term Relationship Orientation). Recent studies have shown that preferences for close relationships (Long-Term Relationship Orientation) are independent of preferences for various sexual partners (Short-Term Relationship Orientation).

2d 4d ratio in men